Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Synthesis, Biological Evaluation and Molecular Docking Studies of Benzimidazole Derivatives Substitutes as New Antimicrobial Agents

Received: 9 July 2024     Accepted: 5 August 2024     Published: 20 August 2024
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Benzimidazole derivatives have assumed an imperative moiety in the hypothetical improvement in heterocyclic science and furthermore utilized broadly in organic synthesis. The synthesis, structure and biological activities of benzimidazole derivatives have been focal point of research enthusiasm for the field of medication because of potential exercises displayed by them. Developments of more current lead atoms are utilized to improve pharmacological action and lessen drug toxicities. After extensive literature review it was thought worthwhile to synthesize some Benzimidazole derivatives and evaluate their antibacterial and antifungal activities. A series of new 2-(1H-benzimidazole-2-yl) phenyl)-2-(substituted benzylidene) hydrazine was designed for showing the above activity. The different hydrazine derivatives (4a-4i) were synthesized by using different substituted benzaldehyde compounds. The structures of synthesized compounds were characterized by IR, 1H NMR, Mass spectral data and elemental analysis. Synthesized compounds were tested in vitro for different kinds of pharmacological activity of this class of medications including antibacterial and antifungal action. The compounds 4d and 4e found most active against E.coli and P. aeurigenosa and 4i found to be most active against B.subtilis and S.aureus. The derivative 4c shows good activity against C.albicans and A.niger. Molecular docking analysis was performed to investigate the binding affinity of the synthesized compounds with target proteins. By means of this research it is concluded that Benzimidazole derivatives are a potent compound compressing of different pharmacological activities and this has been proved by docking studies too. Further evaluation of their properties is required before they can be adopted for widespread use.

Published in Journal of Drug Design and Medicinal Chemistry (Volume 10, Issue 2)
DOI 10.11648/j.jddmc.20241002.12
Page(s) 54-66
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Benzimidazole, Antibacterial, Antifungal, Benzaldehyde, Docking Analysis

1. Introduction
In nature, heterocyclic chemical compounds have a wide distribution and necessary for life. Heterocyclic substances have been involved in the metabolism of all living cells in an important manner. Heterocyclic compounds based on nitrogen are crucial to humankind. Particularly within the entire class of nitrogen-based heterocyclic compounds, benzimidazole has a significant impact on both biological and industrial processes. Benzimidazole is an important heterocyclic system, according to extensive study, since it has biological action against a variety of infections and physical illnesses. In therapeutic compounds including antiviral, anticancer, anthelmintics, anti-inflammatory, analgesics, antihistaminic, antiparasitic, anticonvulsants, antiulcer, antihypertensives, antifungals, proton pump inhibitors, and anticoagulants, among others, benzimidazole derivatives play an active role. Numerous researchers designed the benzimidazole-based compounds and investigated their antibacterial efficacy against various bacterial strains. A key problem nowadays is the rise of bacterial resistance to antibiotics. Due to bacterial resistance, many antibacterial medications are insignificant against germs. The World Health Organization recently released an antibiotic resistance bacterium priority list. An important heterocyclic aromatic chemical with a benzene and imidazole ring is benzimidazole. It is a collection of atoms with potential for use in a range of pharmaceutical objectives. Given its enormous therapeutic usefulness, the discovery and development of medicines containing the benzimidazole moiety is currently a significant and alluring topic of study . Due to their many biological functions, benzoimidazole compounds have recently become a prominent study focus . The most significant nitrogen-containing heterocycles are benzimidazole rings, which are extensively researched and used by the pharmaceutical industry for drug discovery . The benzimidazole compounds were examined for their antibacterial, antiviral (anti-HIV), anticancer, antiplatelet, antiarrhythmic, anti-inflammatory, and analgesic effects . They also contain a wide range of pharmacological characteristics. The synthesis, structure and biological activities of Benzimidazole derivatives have been focal point of research enthusiasm for the field of medication because of potential exercises displayed by them.
2. Material and Methods
The reagents were all of high commercial grade. Standard methods were used to dry and purify the solvents. TLC was used to determine the purity of all the freshly synthesized compounds on silica gel G plates. The melting points were recorded in an uncorrected open capillary tube. The 1H NMR spectra were taken on a Bruker DRX 300 MHz spectrometer in DMSO using TMS (tetramethylsilane) as an internal standard, and the mass spectra were taken on an MS-ESI (SHIMADZU-2010 AT, software class VP). The UV spectra were taken on a SHIMADZU spec-1700 spectrophotometer. Elemental analysis was conducted on Elementa, VarioEL III Carlo Erba 1108.
2.1. Chemistry
The sequence for the synthesis of 2-(1H-benzimidazole-2-yl)phenyl)-2-(substitutedbenzylidene)hydrazine (4a-4i) was shown in the scheme 1. Synthesis starts from the reaction between o-phenylenediamine and salicylic acid in the presence of 4N HCl to give 2-(1H-benzo[d]imidazole-2-yl) phenol (1). The intermediate compound (1) further experiences reaction in the presence of hydrogen bromide and zinc chloride to frame 2-(2-bromophenyl)-1H-benzo[d]imidazole (2) which on further reaction with hydrazine hydrate produces 1-(2-(1H-benzo[d]imidazole-2-yl)phenyl) hydrazine (3). The compound (3) further react with benzaldehyde derivatives to produce 2-(1H-benzimidazole-2-yl)phenyl)-2-(substitutedbenzylidene)hydrazine (4a-4i). All the synthesized compounds 4a-4i were characterized by physical parameters, chromatographic techniques and spectroscopic strategies (IR, 1H NMR and Mass spectroscopy) and assessed for antimicrobial (antibacterial and antifungal activities) activity. The resultant products have consistent estimations of C, H and N contents with anticipated structure. The structures of recently synthesized benzimidazole derivatives were accomplished through IR, 1HNMR and mass spectral data. In IR spectra of series, significant bands were appeared at 1192 (aromatic C-C), 1329 (aromatic C-N), 1668 (aromatic C=N), 3312 (aromatic N-H) and 3080 (aromatic C-H). In 1HNMR spectra of these compounds a broad multiplet of aromatic proton were shown between 6.30 to 8.50 and a significant peak at 4.538 ppm (s, 1H, Ar. N-H) was observed. All derivatives showed M+1and M+2 peak in their mass spectra. All compounds were screened for antibacterial and antifungal activity.
Scheme 1. Protocol for the synthesis of benzimidazole derivatives.
2.1.1. General Method for Synthesis of 2-(1H-Benzo[d]imidazole-2-yl) Phenol (1)
Equimolar quantity of o-phenylenediamine (0.04mol) and salicylic acid (0.04mol) were dissolved in 90ml of 4N HCl in a 500ml round bottom flask. The mixture was refluxed for 18hrs. On cooling, needle shaped crystals were obtained which were washed with ice-cold water. Crude product was recrystallized from hot water to get pure white crystalline compound (1) .
2.1.2. Procedure for the Preparation of 2-(2-Bromophenyl)-1H-benzo[d] Imidazole (2)
In a round bottom flask, fitted with a reflux condenser (the top of which is connected to a guard tube for absorbing hydrogen chloride gas), Zinc chloride (2.09g, 0.02 mol) was dissolved in 30 ml of hydrobromic acid by shaking and 2-(1H-Benzo[d]imidazole-2-yl) phenol (1) (2.1g, 0.01 mol) was added to this mixture. The reaction mixture was refluxed for 15 hrs. The completion of reaction was monitored by TLC. Then reaction mixture was kept overnight in refrigerator, crude product was filtered was recrystallized from water to obtained the pale brown colored product (2) .
2.1.3. Procedure for the Preparation of 1-(2-(1H-Benzo[d]imidazole-2-yl)phenyl) Hydrazine (3)
The intermediate formed in previous reaction 2-(2-Bromophenyl)-1H-benzo[d]imidazole (2) (0.05 mol) and hydrazine hydrate (0.05 mol) in 1,4- dioxane (35 ml) was refluxed on water bath for 5 hrs. The excess of solvent was removed and the product was recrystallized with methanol to obtain the product (3) .
2.1.4. Procedure for the Preparation of 2-(1H-Benzimidazole-2-yl)phenyl)-2-(substitutedbenzylidene)hydrazine (4a-4i)
Various benzaldehyde derivatives (0.01 mol) was added to a solution of 1-(2-(1H-Benzo[d]imidazole-2-yl)phenyl) hydrazine (3) (0.01 mol) in methanol (20 ml). Reaction mixture was refluxed on water bath at 65 0C for 6 – 10 hrs. The reaction mixture was cooled and the solid obtained was filtered was recrystallized with aqueous ethanol to give compounds (4a-4i) .
2.2. Molecular Docking Analysis
Molecular docking analysis was done by Autodock vina and Autodock tool 1.5.6, and visualizations of ligand protein interactions was carried out by using Biovia Discovery Studio visualizer v21.1.0.20298. Five target proteins were selected binding affinity analysis. 3HSB is the crystal structure of YmaH (Hfq) from Bacillus subtilis in complex with an RNA aptamer. For antibacterial affinity analysis in E. coli PDB 1EI1 was downloaded from RCSB. Same as PDB 1JIJ (Crystal structure of S. aureus TyrRS in complex with SB-239629), 6TZ6 (Crystal Structure of Candida Albicans Calcineurin A, Calcineurin B, FKBP12 and FK506), 4ZA4 (Structure of A. niger Fdc1 with the prenylated-flavin cofactor in the iminium form) was selected for the docking studies. Before docking, protein was prepared for missing sidechains and atoms.
2.3. Pharmacokinetic Descriptors Calculation
Various physicochemical and pharmacokinetic descriptors of the synthesized compounds were evaluated by using the tool Molinspiration Cheminformatics server. This online server offers broad range of tools supporting molecule manipulation and processing, including SMILES and SDfile conversion, and calculation of various molecular properties needed in QSAR. The Lipinski rule of five deals four simple physicochemical parameter ranges (MWT ≤ 500, log P ≤ 5, H-bond donors ≤ 5, H-bond acceptors ≤ 10) associated with 90% of orally active drugs that have passed phase II clinical status.
3. Spectral Analysis of the Synthesised Compound
3.1. 1-(2-(1H-Benzo[d]imidazole-2-yl)phenyl)- 2-(2-nitrobenzylidene)hydrazine (4a)
FTIR (KBr, ν, cm-1): 3332(Aromatic N-H stretching (2oamine)), 3087(Aromatic C-H str.), 2951(Aliphatic C-H str.), 1645(C=N stretching), 1514 (Aromatic C=C str.), 1529 (asymmetric N=O str.), 1423(C-N stretching), 1357 (symmetric N=O str.). 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO, ppm): 6.372-7.865 ppm (m, 12H, Ar-H), 8.463 (s, 1H, Ar-H), 8.492 (s, 1H, N-H, D2O exchangeable), 8.965(s, 1H, Ar. N-H, D2O exchangeable). MS (ESI) m/z [% rel. abundance]: 357.15 [M] +, 358.13 [M+1] + Fragments- 357.15, 193.07, 164.46, 118.53, 105.12, 90.34, 78.11.
Elemental analysis: Anal. Calcd. For C20H15N5O2: C, 67.62; H, 4.48; N, 19.75; O, 8.95%. Found: C, 67.69; H, 4.44; N, 19.51%
3.2. 1-(2-(1H-benzo[d]imidazole-2-yl)phenyl)- 2-(2-chlorobenzylidene)hydrazine (4b)
FTIR (KBr) ν (cm-1): 3308(Aromatic N-H str. (2oamine)), 3076(Aromatic C-H str.), 2909(Aliphatic C-H str.), 1677(Aromatic C-C str.), 1676(C=N stretching), 1499(C-N str.), 1055(C-Cl str.). 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO, ppm): 6.489-7.789 ppm (m, 12H, Ar-H), 7.324 (s, 1H, CH), 8.562 (s, 1H, N-H, D2O exchangeable), 9.867 (s, 1H, Ar. N-H, D2O exchangeable). MS (ESI) m/z [% rel. abundance]: 346.10 [M] +, 347.52 [M+1] +, 348.47 [M+2] + Fragments- 346.10, 193.77, 153.02, 117.63, 90.45, 78.44. Elemental analysis: Anal. Calcd. For C20H15ClN4: C, 69.67; H, 4.61; N, 16.21%, Found: C, 69.47; H, 4.68; %.
3.3. 1-(2-(1H-Benzo[d]imidazole-2-yl)phenyl)- 2-(2-methoxybenzylidene)hydrazine (4c)
FTIR (KBr) ν (cm-1): 3280 (Aromatic N-H str. (2oamine)), 3048 (Aromatic C-H str.), 2872 (Aliphatic C-H str.), 1657(C=N stretching), 1588 (Aromatic C-C str.), 1517 (C-N str.), 1348 (C-O-C, asymmetric). 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO, ppm): 3.73(s, 3H, CH3), 6.976-7.7992 ppm (m, 12H, Ar-H), 8.234 (s, 1H,-CH), 8.922 (s, 1H, N-H, D2O exchangeable), 9.185 (s, 1H, Ar. N-H, D2O exchangeable). MS (ESI) m/z [% rel. abundance]: 342.52 [M] +, 343.46 [M+1] +, 3044.89 [M+2] + Fragments- 342.52, 193.73, 149. 63, 118.56, 90.57, 78.66. Elemental analysis: Anal. Calcd. For C21H18N4O: C, 73.64; H, 5.51; N, 16.17; O, 4.70%, Found: C, 73.67; H, 5.35; N, 16.32%
3.4. 1-(2-(1H-Benzo[d]imidazole-2-yl)phenyl)- 2-(3-chlorobenzylidene)hydrazine (4d)
FTIR (KBr) ν (cm-1): 3322(Aromatic N-H str. (2oamine)), 3096(Aromatic C-H str.), 2907(Aliphatic C-H str.), 1664(C=N stretching), 1612(Aromatic C-C str.), 1482(C-N str.), 1048(C-Cl str.). 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO, ppm): 6.489(s, 1H, Ar-H), 7.105-7.854 ppm (m, 11H, Ar-H), 7.987 (s, 1H,-CH), 8.235 (s, 1H, N-H, D2O exchangeable), 9.546 (s, 1H, Ar. N-H, D2O exchangeable), MS (ESI) m/z [% rel. abundance]: 346.25 [M] +, 347.68 [M+1] +, 348.56 [M+2] +. Elemental analysis: Anal. Calcd. For C20H15ClN4: C, 69.67; H, 4.31; N, 16.21; Cl, 10.34%, Found: C, 69.45; H, 4.37; Cl, 10.16%
3.5. 1-(2-(1H-Benzo[d]imidazole-2-yl)phenyl)- 2-(3-methoxybenzylidene)hydrazine (4e)
FTIR (KBr) ν (cm-1): 3298 (Aromatic N-H str. (2oamine)), 3075 (Aromatic C-H str.), 2898 (Aliphatic C-H str.), 1649(C=N stretching), 1568 (Aromatic C-C str.), 1510 (C-N str.), 1308 (C-O-C, asymmetric). 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO, ppm): 3.657 (s, 3H, CH3), 6.524-7.829 ppm (m, 11H, Ar-H), 7.145(s, 1H, Ar-H), 8.231 (s, 1H, -CH), 8.587 (s, 1H, Ar. N-H, D2O exchangeable), 8.489 (s, 1H, N-H, D2O exchangeable). MS (ESI) m/z [% rel. abundance]: 342.67 [M] +, 343.50 [M+1] +, 344.94 [M+2] +. Elemental analysis: Anal. Calcd. For C21H18N4O2: C, 73.04; H, 4.51; N, 16.47; O: 4.78%, Found: C, 73.47; H, 4.59; O: 4.53%
3.6. 1-(2-(1H-Benzo[d]imidazole-2-yl)phenyl)- 2-(3-nitrobenzylidene)hydrazine (4f)
FTIR (KBr) ν (cm-1): 3326(Aromatic N-H stretching (2oamine)), 3089(Aromatic C-H str.), 2931(Aliphatic C-H str.), 1685(C=N stretching), 1529 (Aromatic C-C str.), 1513 (asymmetric N=O str.), 1358 (symmetric N=O str.), 1424(C-N stretching), 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO, ppm): 6.548 -8.692 ppm (m, 11H, Ar-H), 8.549 (s, 1H,-CH), 8.682 (s, 1H, Ar-CH), 8.693 (s, 1H, N-H, D2O exchangeable), 9.548 (s, 1H, Ar. N-H, D2O exchangeable). MS (ESI) m/z [% rel. abundance]: 357.48 [M] +, 358.62[M+1] +. Elemental analysis: Anal. Calcd. For C20H15N4O2: C, 67.66; H, 4.28; N, 19.55; O, 8.85%. Found: C, 67.33; H, 4.28; O, 8.79%
3.7. 1-(2-(1H-Benzo[d]imidazole-2-yl)phenyl)- 2-(4-methoxybenzylidene)hydrazine (4g)
FTIR (KBr) ν (cm-1): 3289 (Aromatic N-H str. (2oamine)), 3074 (Aromatic C-H str.), 2888 (Aliphatic C-H str.), 1674(C=N stretching), 1543 (Aromatic C-C str.), 1542 (C-N str.), 1303 (C-O-C, asymmetric). 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO, ppm): 3.467 (s, 3H,-CH3), 6.821- 7.547(dd, 4H, Ar-CH), 6.984 -7.798 ppm (m, 8H, Ar-H), 8.397 (s, 1H, -CH), 8.745 (s, 1H, Ar. N-H, D2O exchangeable), 9.643 (s, 1H, N-H, D2O exchangeable). MS (ESI) m/z [% rel. abundance]: 342.74 [M] +, 343.58 [M+1] +, 344.62 [M+2] +. Elemental analysis: Anal. Calcd. For C21H18N4O: C, 73.64; H, 5.31; N, 16.47; O, 4.85%, Found: C, 73.82; H, 5.52; N, 16.25%,
3.8. 1-(2-(1H-Benzo[d]imidazole-2-yl)phenyl)- 2-(4-chlorobenzylidene)hydrazine (4h)
FTIR (KBr) ν (cm-1): 3312(Aromatic N-H str. (2oamine)), 3089(Aromatic C-H str.), 2905(Aliphatic C-H str.), 1688(C=N stretching), 1610(Aromatic C-C str.), 1482(C-N str.), 1046(C-Cl str.). 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO, ppm): 6.464- 7.895ppm (m, 8H, Ar-H), 7.458 – 7.642 (dd, 4H, Ar-CH), 8.563 (s, 1H, -CH), 8.684 (s, 1H, Ar. N-H, D2O exchangeable), 9.432 (s, 1H, N-H, D2O exchangeable). MS (ESI) m/z [% rel. abundance]: 346.38 [M] +, 347.70 [M+1] +, 348.69 [M+2] +. Elemental analysis: Anal. Calcd. For C20H15ClN4: C, 69.35; H, 4.31; N, 16.27; Cl, 10.34%, Found: C, 69.57; H, 4.17; N, 16.59%
3.9. 1-(2-(1H-Benzo[d]imidazole-2-yl)phenyl)- 2-(4-nitrobenzylidene)hydrazine (4i)
FTIR (KBr) ν (cm-1): 3313(Aromatic N-H stretching (2oamine)), 3089(Aromatic C-H str.), 2927(Aliphatic C-H str.), 1678(C=N stretching), 1539 (Aromatic C-C str.), 1516 (asymmetric N=O str.), 1449(C-N stretching), 1356 (symmetric N=O str.). 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO, ppm): 6.548- 7.702 ppm (m, 8H, Ar-H), 7.947 – 8.292 (dd, 4H, Ar-CH), 8.428 (s, 1H, -CH), 8.621 (s, 1H, Ar. N-H, D2O exchangeable), 9.642 (s, 1H, N-H, D2O exchangeable). MS (ESI) m/z [% rel. abundance]: 357.65 [M] +, 358.86[M+1] +. Elemental analysis: Anal. Calcd. For C20H15N5O2: C, 67.66; H, 4.48; N, 19.55; O, 8.72%. Found: C, 67.86; H, 4.61; N, 19.70; O, 8.72%
4. Biological Evaluation
4.1. Antibacterial Activity
Gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria was examined for antibacterial activity using Muller Hinton agar (Hi-media) plates at 37°C for 24 hours using the agar diffusion cup plate technique. At a concentration of 50 g/ml, compounds were tested for antibacterial activity against the bacterial strains S. aureus, P. aeureginosa, B. subtilis, and E. coli. The benchmark medication for comparing antibacterial activity was ciprofloxacin. The results, which are displayed in Tables 1 and 2, showed that 4d and 4e, which were created compounds, were most effective against E. coli and B. subtilis, respectively, while 4i was most effective against P. aeurigenosa and S. aureus. The consequences of antibacterial investigations are available in Tables 1 and 2 and in (Figure 1) .
Table 1. Antibacterial activity of the synthesized compounds.

No of compound

E. coli

B. subtilis

25μgml-1

50μgml-1

100μgml-1

25μgml-1

50 μg ml-1

100 μg ml-1

4a

8.22±0.38

11.16±0.19

15.87±0.16

8.42±0.21

11.28±0.64

15.28±0.17

4b

9.54±0.29

14.07±0.41

16.67±0.24

9.94±0.34

10.57±0.17

16.65±0.15

4c

7.54±0.23

10.97±0.40

14.82±0.37

8.46±0.19

11.69±0.91

15.53±0.34

4d

10.24±0.28

14.21±0.27

15.18±0.43

7.43±0.16

11.51±0.26

14.72±0.27

4e

9.54±0.19

11.57±0.64

15.02±0.42

10.28±0.23

14.64±0.46

17.22±0.41

4f

9.21± 0.37

13.94±0.19

15.94±0.84

8.87±0.12

11.35±0.94

15.57±0.47

4g

7.56±0.51

10.14±0.72

14.54±0.74

9.29±0.57

11.69±0.16

16.32±0.51

4h

8.11±0.14

11.56±0.72

14.57±0.41

10.95±0.78

14.39±0.42

16.97±0.24

4i

7.79±0.64

11.34±0.43

15.24±0.87

9.42±0.57

10.64±0.72

15.27±0.43

Ciprofloxacin

-

14.38±0.13

-

-

14.82±0.21

-

Table 2. Antibacterial activity of the synthesized compounds.

No of compound

P. aeruginosa

S. aureus

25 μg ml-1

50 μg ml-1

100 μg ml-1

25 μg ml-1

50μgml-1

100μgml-1

4a

10.57±0.35

11.36±0.54

14.54±0.17

10.52±0.11

14.08±0.49

17.06±0.35

4b

9.54±0.12

12.04±0.31

15.28±0.35

9.14±0.17

11.61±0.35

14.35±0.29

4c

10.24±0.18

14.38±0.46

17.5±1 0.17

8.87±0.42

12.26±0.14

15.37±0.64

4d

8.18±0.21

11.64±0.54

15.21±0.13

7.12±0.11

10.84±0.49

15.87±0.27

4e

10.64±0.17

14.24±0.12

17.69± 0.37

8.57±0.53

11.64±0.35

15.49±0.17

4f

9.42±0.72

11.03±0.31

15.68± 0.68

7.28±0.33

12.54±0.15

16.65±0.24

4g

8.27±0.34

11.26±0.19

14.34± 0.54

10.84±0.29

13.97±0.46

17.28±0.15

4h

8.86±0.47

12.35±0.42

15.69±0.36

7.39±0.74

11.31±0.79

14.10±0.48

4i

10.86±0.24

14.38±0.68

16.51±0.74

10.27±0.31

14.38±0.42

15.84±0.28

Ciprofloxacin

-

14.49±0.16

-

-

14.79±0.12

-

Figure 1. Antibacterial activity of the synthesized compounds.
4.2. Antifungal Activity
On Sabouraud's dextrose agar (Himedia) plates, antifungal activity was evaluated using the agar diffusion cup plate technique against the dimorphic fungus C. albicans and A. niger. At a concentration of 50 g/ml, antifungal activity was tested for. The benchmark medicine for comparing antifungal activity was fluconazole. As a solvent control for antifungal activity, DMSO was employed. The results shown in Table 3 and in (Figure 2) revealed that Compound 4c shows good activity against C.albicans and A.niger .
Table 3. Antifungal activity of the synthesized compounds.

Compounds

C. albicana

A. niger

25μgml-1

50μgml-1

100μgml-1

25μgml-1

50μgml-1

100μgml-1

4a

6.39±0.5

8.55±0.3

11.6±0.42

6.47±0.31

8.65±0.59

10.9±0.6

4b

7.48±0.2

8±0.9

10.8± 0.8

8.37±0.31

9.8±0.5

10.42±0.21

4c

8.19±0.17

11.47±0.5

13.56±0.40

8.75±0.37

11.15±0.9

13.26 ± 0.7

4d

7.60±0.4

10.3±0.9

12.55±0.5

8.04+0.71

10.4±0.8

12.5±0.31

4e

6.3±0.9

9.9±0.2

11.3±0.15

6.3±0.6

9.63±0.7

12.70±0.29

4f

7.77±0.3

10.9±0.7

13.20±0.6

8.6±0.3

10.6±0.5

12.7±0.12

4g

7.89±0.60

11.6±0.9

13.3±0.41

7.52±0.7

11.10±0.4

13.51±0.4

4h

8.13±0.11

11.09±0.97

13.02±0.11

7.65±0.9

11±0.2

13.6±0.46

4i

7.9±0.14

10.16±0.3

12.53±0.46

6.63±0.5

9.86±0.1

12.4±0.8

Fluconazole

12.4±0.5

11.2±0.8

Figure 2. Antifungal activity of the synthesized compounds.
The outcome revealed that the compounds with nitro and methoxy groups were found to be most active against gram +ve, gram –ve and fungal strains.
5. Molecular Docking Evaluation
Docking analysis was performed to explore the binding interactions with the target proteins. The results of the docking analysis are given in Table 4. Compound 4f shows excellent binding with the 1EI1 protein with -9.9 docking score (Figure 3). Same as for binding with S. aureus, compound 4a exhibit highest docking score -10.4 with two hydrogen bonds with the residues Thr75 and Gly38 (Figure 4). Compound 4b and 4f shows excellent binding with B. subtilis protein (3HSB). Figures 5 and 6 denotes ligand interaction diagram of compound 4b and 4f. Compounds 4a and 4f shows excellent binding with the target protein 6TZ6 (Figures 7 and 8). Compound 4d exhibit docking score -9.1 for the target protein 4ZA4 (Figure 9).
Table 4. Docking results of the synthesized compounds.

Code

3HSB for affinity (kcal/mol)

1EI1 for affinity (kcal/mol)

1JIJ for affinity (kcal/mol)

4ZA4 for affinity (kcal/mol)

6TZ6 for affinity (kcal/mol)

4a

-8.4

-9.4

-10.4

-8.8

-10.6

4b

-9.0

-9.2

-8.6

-8.7

-10.1

4c

-8.5

-8.9

-9.2

-8.4

-10.1

4d

-8.6

-9.1

-9.7

-9.1

-9.6

4e

-8.2

-9.0

-9.2

-8.5

-9.4

4f

-9.0

-9.9

-10.0

-8.8

-10.6

4g

-8.2

-9.1

-8.8

-8.8

-9.6

4h

-8.2

-9.2

-9.5

-8.6

-9.6

4i

-7.6

-9.6

-8.1

-9.0

-9.8

Figure 3. 2D ligand interaction diagram of compound 4f with 1EI1.
Figure 4. 2D ligand interaction diagram of compound 4a with 1JIJ.
Figure 5. 2D ligand interaction diagram of compound 4b with 3HSB.
Figure 6. 2D ligand interaction diagram of compound 4f with 3HSB.
Figure 7. 2D ligand interaction diagram of compound 4a with 6TZ6.
Figure 8. 2D ligand interaction diagram of compound 4f with 6TZ6.
Figure 9. 2D ligand interaction diagram of compound 4d with 4ZA4.
6. Pharmacokinetic Parameters Calculation
All synthesized compounds were analyzed for pharmacokinetic and physicochemical properties. The results are given in Table 5. All compounds have molecular weight in the range (Mol.Wt. ≤ 500). Compounds having low molecular weight are easily absorbed, diffused and transported as compared to high molecular weight compounds. With increase in molecular weight except certain limit, the bulkiness of the compounds is also increasing comparably. The LogP (octanol / water partition co efficient) of all compounds were calculated and shown violation for all compounds. The LogP value is used to calculate the lipophilic efficiency that measures the potency of drug. All compounds show one violation for Lipinski’s rule of five of drug likeness.
Table 5. Physicochemical and pharmacokinetic parameters result of the synthesized compounds.

Code

Log P

TPSA

Mol. Wt.

nON

nOHNH

No. of violations

4a

6.26

98.90

357.37

7

2

1

4b

6.98

53.07

346.82

4

2

1

4c

6.36

62.31

342.40

5

2

1

4d

6.95

53.07

346.82

4

2

1

4e

6.33

62.31

342.40

5

2

1

4f

6.23

98.90

357.37

7

2

1

4g

6.38

62.31

342.40

5

2

1

4h

7.00

53.07

346.82

4

2

1

4i

6.28

98.90

357.37

7

2

1

7. Results and Discussion
All of the recently synthesized compounds 4a–4i were evaluated for their antimicrobial (antibacterial and antifungal activities) activity using physical characteristics, chromatographic methods, and spectroscopic techniques (IR, 1H NMR, and mass spectroscopy). The final products contain predictable structures and reliable estimates of the concentrations of C, H, and N. Using IR, 1HNMR, and mass spectral data, the structures of freshly synthesized benzimidazole derivatives were determined. Significant bands were seen at 1192 (aromatic C-C), 1329 (aromatic C-N), 1668 (aromatic C=N), 3312 (aromatic N-H), and 3080 (aromatic C-H) in the IR spectra of the series. These compounds 1HNMR spectra revealed a broad multiplet of aromatic proton between 6.30 and 8.50 and a notable peak at 4.538 ppm (s, 1H, Ar. N-H). All derivatives mass spectra have M+1 and M+2 peaks. All substances underwent testing for antibacterial and antifungal properties.
Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria were tested for antibacterial activity using Muller Hinton agar (Hi-media) plates at 37°C for 24 hours using the agar diffusion cup plate method. At a concentration of 50 g/ml, compounds were tested for antibacterial activity against the bacterial strains S. aureus, P. aeureginosa, B. subtilis, and E. coli. The benchmark drug for comparing antibacterial activity was ciprofloxacin. Tables 1 and 2 results demonstrate that 4d and 4e, two freshly synthesized compounds, were most effective against E. coli and B. subtilis, respectively, while 4i was most effective against P. aeurigenosa and S. aureus. On Sabouraud's dextrose agar (Himedia) plates, antifungal activity was evaluated using the agar diffusion cup plate method against the dimorphic fungus C. albicans and A. niger. At a concentration of 50 g/ml, antifungal activity was screened. The standard drug for comparing antifungal activity was fluconazole. As a solvent control for antifungal activity, DMSO was employed. According to the findings in table 3, compound 4c has good effectiveness against C. albicans and A. niger.
Against gram +ve, gram -ve, and fungal strains, the results showed that drugs having nitro and methoxy groups were more effective.
According to tables 4 and 5, Compounds 4a and 4f shows excellent binding with the target protein 6TZ6. Compound 4d exhibit docking score -9.1 for the target protein 4ZA4. All compounds show one violation for Lipinski’s rule of five of drug likeness.
8. Conclusion
In conclusion, a series of novel benzimidazole derivatives was synthesized. The title compounds 4a–4i were evaluated for their antimicrobial (antibacterial and antifungal activities) activity. Preliminary antibacterial studies indicated that 4d and 4e, two freshly synthesized compounds, were most effective against E. coli and B. subtilis, respectively, while 4i was most effective against P. aeurigenosa and S. aureus. Specifically, compounds 4c has good effectiveness against C. albicans and A. niger. The results of this antimicrobial evaluation indicated that these compounds are a promising type of potential antibacterial agents which was shown through docking studies also. Further evaluation of their properties is required before they can be adopted for widespread use.
Abbreviations

S. aureus

Staphylococcus aureus

P. aeureginosa

Pseudomonas aeureginosa

B. subtilis

Bacillus subtilis

E. coli

Escherichia coli

C. albicans

Candida albicans

A. niger

Aspergillus niger

Ppm

parts Per Million

DMSO

Dimethyl Sulfoxide

Acknowledgments
The authors are thankful to IIT New Delhi for conducting 1H NMR spectral studies. The authors are also grateful to DIYA LABS Navi-Mumbai for the conductance of Mass spectroscopy and Elemental analysis. Authors are also thankful to Rajiv academy for pharmacy, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh, India for providing the laboratory facilities.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
[1] Tahlan S, Kumar S, Ramasamy K, Lim SM, Shah SA, Mani V, Pathania R, Narasimhan B. Design, synthesis and biological profile of heterocyclic benzimidazole analogues as prospective antimicrobial and antiproliferative agents. BMC chemistry2019; 13(1): 50.
[2] Vasava MS, Bhoi MN, Rathwa SK, Jethava DJ, Acharya PT, Patel DB, Patel HD. Benzimidazole: A milestone in the field of medicinal chemistry. Mini Rev Med Chem 2020; 20(7): 532-65.
[3] Anand K, Wakode S. Synthesis, characterization and biological evaluation of benzimidazole derivatives. IJPSR 2018; 9(2): 617-24.
[4] Demirayak Ş, Mohsen UA, Karaburun AÇ. Synthesis and anticancer and anti-HIV testing of some pyrazino [1, 2-a] benzimidazole derivatives. Eur J Med Chem 2002; 37(3): 255-60.
[5] Eisa HM, Barghash AE, Badr SM, Farahat AA. Synthesis and antimicrobial activity of certain benzimidazole and fused benzimidazole derivatives. J Med Chem 2010.
[6] Galal SA; Hegab KH; Kassab AS; Rodriguez ML; Kerwin SM; Abdel-Mo'men A; El Diwani HI. New transition metal ion complexes with benzimidazole-5-carboxylic acid hydrazides with antitumor activity. Eur J Med Chem 2009; 44(4): 1500-8.
[7] Gellis A, Kovacic H, Boufatah N, Vanelle P. Synthesis and cytotoxicity evaluation of some benzimidazole-4, 7-diones as bioreductive anticancer agents. Eur J Med Chem 2008; 43(9): 1858-64.
[8] Alp M, Göker H, Brun R, Yıldız S. Synthesis and antiparasitic and antifungal evaluation of 2′-arylsubstituted-1H, 1′ H-[2, 5′] bisbenzimidazolyl-5-carboxamidines. Eur J Med Chem 2009; 44(5): 2002-8.
[9] Mann J, Baron A, Opoku-Boahen Y, Johansson E, Parkinson G, Kelland LR, Neidle S. A new class of symmetric bisbenzimidazole-based DNA minor groove-binding agents showing antitumor activity. J Med Chem 2001; 44(2): 138-44.
[10] Singh DN, Verma N, Pathak LP, Raghuwanshi S, Shukla PK, Kulshreshtha DK. Synthesis and antifungal activity of novel benzimidazole incorporated anthraquinones. Indian J Heterocycl Chem 2007; 17(2): 161-4.
[11] Cee VJ, Downing NS. A one-pot method for the synthesis of 2-aminobenzimidazoles and related heterocycles. Tetrahedron Lett 2006; 47(22): 3747-50.
[12] Dubey PK, Babu B, Narayana MV. Synthesis of 2-indolylbenzimidazoles using Fischer’s indole method. Indian J Heterocycl Chem 2007.
[13] Sharma D, Kumar N, Pathak D. Synthesis, characterization and biological evaluation of some newer carbazole derivatives. J Serb Chem Soc 2014; 79(2): 125-32.
[14] Sharma D, Sharma G. K., Pathak D, Sharma M. C. Synthesis and evaluation of antibacterial, anthelmintic activities of substituted benzimidazoles analogues. Indian Drugs 2017; 54(6): 69-76.
[15] Shah H. J., Chaudhari J. A. Synthesis, characterization and biological studies of some novel benzimidazole derivatives. J Chem Pharm Res 2014; 6(7): 1890-1894.
[16] Kumar N. and Pathak D., 2019. Synthesis, characterization and biological evaluation of some newer benzimidazole derivatives by mannich reaction. Indian Drugs 56(7).
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Bansal, S., Gaur, R., Bhardwaj, H., Kumar, N., Sharma, G. K., et al. (2024). Synthesis, Biological Evaluation and Molecular Docking Studies of Benzimidazole Derivatives Substitutes as New Antimicrobial Agents. Journal of Drug Design and Medicinal Chemistry, 10(2), 54-66. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jddmc.20241002.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Bansal, S.; Gaur, R.; Bhardwaj, H.; Kumar, N.; Sharma, G. K., et al. Synthesis, Biological Evaluation and Molecular Docking Studies of Benzimidazole Derivatives Substitutes as New Antimicrobial Agents. J. Drug Des. Med. Chem. 2024, 10(2), 54-66. doi: 10.11648/j.jddmc.20241002.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Bansal S, Gaur R, Bhardwaj H, Kumar N, Sharma GK, et al. Synthesis, Biological Evaluation and Molecular Docking Studies of Benzimidazole Derivatives Substitutes as New Antimicrobial Agents. J Drug Des Med Chem. 2024;10(2):54-66. doi: 10.11648/j.jddmc.20241002.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.jddmc.20241002.12,
      author = {Sonal Bansal and Rishabh Gaur and Harsh Bhardwaj and Nitin Kumar and Gyanendra Kumar Sharma and Shashank Shekher Mishra},
      title = {Synthesis, Biological Evaluation and Molecular Docking Studies of Benzimidazole Derivatives Substitutes as New Antimicrobial Agents
    },
      journal = {Journal of Drug Design and Medicinal Chemistry},
      volume = {10},
      number = {2},
      pages = {54-66},
      doi = {10.11648/j.jddmc.20241002.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jddmc.20241002.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jddmc.20241002.12},
      abstract = {Benzimidazole derivatives have assumed an imperative moiety in the hypothetical improvement in heterocyclic science and furthermore utilized broadly in organic synthesis. The synthesis, structure and biological activities of benzimidazole derivatives have been focal point of research enthusiasm for the field of medication because of potential exercises displayed by them. Developments of more current lead atoms are utilized to improve pharmacological action and lessen drug toxicities. After extensive literature review it was thought worthwhile to synthesize some Benzimidazole derivatives and evaluate their antibacterial and antifungal activities. A series of new 2-(1H-benzimidazole-2-yl) phenyl)-2-(substituted benzylidene) hydrazine was designed for showing the above activity. The different hydrazine derivatives (4a-4i) were synthesized by using different substituted benzaldehyde compounds. The structures of synthesized compounds were characterized by IR, 1H NMR, Mass spectral data and elemental analysis. Synthesized compounds were tested in vitro for different kinds of pharmacological activity of this class of medications including antibacterial and antifungal action. The compounds 4d and 4e found most active against E.coli and P. aeurigenosa and 4i found to be most active against B.subtilis and S.aureus. The derivative 4c shows good activity against C.albicans and A.niger. Molecular docking analysis was performed to investigate the binding affinity of the synthesized compounds with target proteins. By means of this research it is concluded that Benzimidazole derivatives are a potent compound compressing of different pharmacological activities and this has been proved by docking studies too. Further evaluation of their properties is required before they can be adopted for widespread use.
    },
     year = {2024}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Synthesis, Biological Evaluation and Molecular Docking Studies of Benzimidazole Derivatives Substitutes as New Antimicrobial Agents
    
    AU  - Sonal Bansal
    AU  - Rishabh Gaur
    AU  - Harsh Bhardwaj
    AU  - Nitin Kumar
    AU  - Gyanendra Kumar Sharma
    AU  - Shashank Shekher Mishra
    Y1  - 2024/08/20
    PY  - 2024
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jddmc.20241002.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.jddmc.20241002.12
    T2  - Journal of Drug Design and Medicinal Chemistry
    JF  - Journal of Drug Design and Medicinal Chemistry
    JO  - Journal of Drug Design and Medicinal Chemistry
    SP  - 54
    EP  - 66
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2472-3576
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jddmc.20241002.12
    AB  - Benzimidazole derivatives have assumed an imperative moiety in the hypothetical improvement in heterocyclic science and furthermore utilized broadly in organic synthesis. The synthesis, structure and biological activities of benzimidazole derivatives have been focal point of research enthusiasm for the field of medication because of potential exercises displayed by them. Developments of more current lead atoms are utilized to improve pharmacological action and lessen drug toxicities. After extensive literature review it was thought worthwhile to synthesize some Benzimidazole derivatives and evaluate their antibacterial and antifungal activities. A series of new 2-(1H-benzimidazole-2-yl) phenyl)-2-(substituted benzylidene) hydrazine was designed for showing the above activity. The different hydrazine derivatives (4a-4i) were synthesized by using different substituted benzaldehyde compounds. The structures of synthesized compounds were characterized by IR, 1H NMR, Mass spectral data and elemental analysis. Synthesized compounds were tested in vitro for different kinds of pharmacological activity of this class of medications including antibacterial and antifungal action. The compounds 4d and 4e found most active against E.coli and P. aeurigenosa and 4i found to be most active against B.subtilis and S.aureus. The derivative 4c shows good activity against C.albicans and A.niger. Molecular docking analysis was performed to investigate the binding affinity of the synthesized compounds with target proteins. By means of this research it is concluded that Benzimidazole derivatives are a potent compound compressing of different pharmacological activities and this has been proved by docking studies too. Further evaluation of their properties is required before they can be adopted for widespread use.
    
    VL  - 10
    IS  - 2
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • Document Sections

    1. 1. Introduction
    2. 2. Material and Methods
    3. 3. Spectral Analysis of the Synthesised Compound
    4. 4. Biological Evaluation
    5. 5. Molecular Docking Evaluation
    6. 6. Pharmacokinetic Parameters Calculation
    7. 7. Results and Discussion
    8. 8. Conclusion
    Show Full Outline
  • Abbreviations
  • Acknowledgments
  • Conflicts of Interest
  • References
  • Cite This Article
  • Author Information